News Summary
The ASUCI Senate at UC Irvine voted to table a resolution calling for divestment from companies alleged to support the genocide of Palestinians. Concerns about the resolution’s language and definitions led to a lack of support during the vote. Proponents faced criticism regarding the characterization of Zionism and its alignment with the U.S. State Department’s definition. The decision reflects a quieter campus atmosphere compared to previous years, with diminishing protests and more responsive administration towards Jewish student welfare. ASUCI has not commented on the decision.
UC Irvine Student Senate Halts Divestment Resolution on Palestinian Issues
IRVINE, Calif. – The Associated Students of UC Irvine (ASUCI) Senate voted to indefinitely table a proposed resolution that aimed to compel the university to divest from companies perceived as supporting the genocide of Palestinians. The resolution, which would have mandated ASUCI to provide quarterly disclosures of purchases related to such companies, did not garner enough support to pass during the recent vote.
If enacted, the resolution would have required ASUCI to create an official prohibited suppliers list focused on businesses involved in the occupation of Palestinian territories. Additionally, it called upon the University of California Board of Regents and the UC Irvine administration to divest from all companies associated with the apartheid practices and occupation affecting Palestinian lands.
Concerns Over the Resolution’s Language
The decision to table the resolution came amid discussions highlighting significant concerns about its language. Nova Sari, a senior at UCI, expressed that this marked a notable turn in ASUCI’s history, given that it was the first instance in several years where a divestment resolution encountered such a setback. A key point of contention was the resolution’s definition of Zionism, described by its proponents as a “settler-colonial ideology” involved in the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. This controversial characterization contributed to the divisive nature of the discussions.
Questions arose about whether the proposed definition should be aligned with the one provided by the U.S. State Department. Proponents defended their stance by suggesting the definition should reflect the perspectives of those affected rather than external categorizations. Rabbi Daniel Levine noted that the lack of clarity regarding the resolution’s language had a decisive impact on the discussions.
Statistical Arguments and Further Critique
During the deliberations, Sari presented statistics concerning Arab student enrollment in Israeli universities, challenging the rationale behind the academic boycott alluded to in the resolution. She criticized the resolution for naming organizations that were not recognized officially on campus and pointed out the difficulties in classifying certain businesses as either Zionist or Jewish.
Ultimately, the ASUCI Senate opted to table the resolution indefinitely, lacking support from members outside of those who proposed it. The decision was believed to be influenced by a significant turnout of Jewish students expressing opposition to the resolution, as indicated by various attendees.
Political Context and Campus Atmosphere
Reactions to the resolution included statements from the Anti-Defamation League’s Orange County/Long Beach Regional Director, who described the proposed measure as “harmful and performative.” The director praised students who articulated their concerns against it. Sari herself noted that the campus atmosphere had become quieter compared to the previous year, and she felt more secure, highlighting that university administrators appeared to be responsive to the welfare of Jewish students.
Additionally, Levine indicated that the frequency of anti-Israel demonstrations on campus had diminished substantially, creating a less charged environment for discussions related to the issue. Sari observed that opposition to the resolution had not been met with the same aggressive protests as experienced in prior years.
Next Steps for ASUCI
As of now, the ASUCI has not provided a response to inquiries regarding the resolution and the decision to table it indefinitely. The ongoing situation underscores the importance of fostering educational spaces that are free from discrimination and hostility, as the university continues to navigate complex and sensitive political climates.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
Additional Resources
- Jewish Journal: UCI Student Senate Halts Divestment Resolution
- ABC7: UCI Chancellor’s Talks with Protesters
- OC Register: UCI Students Firm on Demands
- OC Register: Students Protest at UCI Chancellor’s Home
- ABC7: UC Riverside Students Agreement
- Wikipedia: Divestment
- Google Search: Palestinian Divestment UCI
- Google Scholar: UCI Student Senate Divestment
- Encyclopedia Britannica: UCI Divestment
- Google News: UCI Divestment Resolution
